Thursday, September 27, 2012

(#208) The Real Fiscal Cliff

How to spot the ledge

As posted to the Mises Institute Media You Tube Channel on 9/26/12

 


Archived from the live Mises.tv broadcast, this lecture delivered by Peter Schiff on the day after Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke announced QE3, was presented at the Mises Circle in Manhattan: "Central Banking, Deposit Insurance, and Economic Decline." Includes an introduction by Lew Rockwell, founder of the Ludwig von Mises Institute.

Peter Schiff, is an American businessman, investment broker, author and financial commentator. Schiff is CEO and chief global strategist  of Euro Pacific Capital Inc., a broker-dealer based in Westport, Connecticut, and CEO of Euro Pacific Precious Metals, LLC, a gold and silver dealer based in New York City.

Sunday, September 16, 2012

(#207) "The Fed will Destroy the World"

Marc Faber on the Federal Reserve's QE3 Announcement

As appeared on Bloomberg Television's "In the Loop" on 9/14/12

 




"Everything will collapse" is the consequence Gloom, Boom, & Doom's Marc Faber sees from the announcement of QE3, the Federal Reserve's latest 'stimulus' (and the fallacy and misconception of how money-printing can help employment). In a wondrously clarifying interview on Bloomberg TV on 9/14/12, Faber explained why he was 'happy', since "the asset values of his holdings will go up" but as a responsible citizen he is worried because "the monetary policies of the US will destroy the world." It truly is class warfare under a veil of 'its good for you' as he notes: "the fallacy of monetary policy in the U.S. is to believe this money will go to the man on the street. It won't. It goes to the Mayfair economy of the well-to-do people and boosts asset prices of Warhols."
Marc Faber, is a Swiss investor and publisher of the Gloom Boom & Doom Report newsletter and has also authored several books.  He is the director of Marc Faber Ltd which acts as an investment advisor and fund manager.

Sunday, September 9, 2012

(#206) The Euro in One Lesson

A short, concise explanation of the tragedy of the Euro

As posted on the Tom Woods You Tube Channel on 8/27/12

 


Tom Woods explains, with reference to the work of Philipp Bagus, why the Euro crisis was predictable, and in fact the logical outcome of the incentives built into the system.

Thomas E. Woods, Jr., is an American historian, economist, political analyst, and New York Times-bestselling author.  He has written extensively on the subjects of American history, contemporary politics, and economic theory. He is the founder of Liberty Classroom, which provides online courses on history and economics.

 

Monday, September 3, 2012

(#205) The Phillips Curve

The relationship between inflation and unemployment

A component of Welker's Wikinomics Video Lecture Series posted on 1/10/12 and 1/11/12, respectively.

 


This video lesson introduces a basic Macroeconomic model showing the short-run tradeoff that exists between inflation and unemployment in nation's economy. By examining the effect that a shift in Aggregate Demand has on the average price level and the level of output and employment, we observe a simple tradeoff: lower unemployment generally comes at the cost of higher inflation, while lower inflation may require higher unemployment.


In the second lesson on the Phillips Curve model we will further explore the relationship between unemployment and inflation in an economy, this time examining what happens in the long-run, or the flexible-wage period, following a change in aggregate demand in an economy. Will the tradeoff between inflation and unemployment exist even once wages and prices have had time to adjust to the level of demand for a nation's output?

We will find that, in fact, as an economy self-corrects from changes to aggregate demand and output returns to its full employment level, the unemployment rate will always return to its natural rate, even as inflation rises and falls with demand in the economy.

What is important to note is that the author prefaces changes in his model resulting from changes in the economy with statements that are essentially saying "assuming no government intervention".  In other words, the point that is being made is that, assuming the government does not intervene in the economy, the free market is self-correcting.